Skip to content

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for treatment refractory anxiety disorders

Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for treatment refractory anxiety disorders - MBCT for anxiety disorders

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39672
Enrollment
128
Registered
2012-03-05
Start date
2012-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

anxiety disorders

Interventions

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) (Condition 1) MBCT will be offered according to the protocol of Segal, Williams, and Teasdale (2003). MBCT, adapted for anxiety disorders, and will be prov

Sponsors

PsyQ
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - still fullfilling the criteria for an DSM IV axis 1 anxiety disorder - refrain from treatment and counseling more frequently than once a month during the intervention - stable use of anti-depressant medication or Benzodiazepines at leatst 3 months before inclusion - Willingness to keep the dosage on a constant level during the intervention For MBCT: -willingness to complete daily homework assignments between sessions during the MBCT course.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Primary axis 1 diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence, suicidality or psychotic symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Sheehan et al., 1998a, 1998b). The MINI+ will be used to obtain DSM-IV diagnoses. The validation of the Dutch translation of the clinician rated (CR) version of the MINI (van Vliet & de Beurs, 2007) against the Structured Clinical Interview DSM-III-R-patient version (SCID-P) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview for ICD-10 (CIDI) showed good to very good kappa values (Sheehan et al., 1998b). • Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). The BAI is a self-report questionnaire which consists of 21 items, each describing a common symptom of anxiety over the past week on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 to 3 (total score is 63). The scale has good internal consistency (0.92) and convergent validity (0.51) and discriminates between depression and anxiety. Test-retest reliability also appeared to be sufficient (0.75). The BAI will be used as primary outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Fear Questionnaire (FQ) (Marks & Matthews, 1979). This self-report questionnaire consists of 3 subscales (agoraphobia, social phobia and blood/injury dimensions). Besides these subscales the FQ also incorporates one scale assessing severity of avoidance behavior, how troublesome and disturbing/disabling the present symptoms are according to the patient. A Dutch validation study showed that all scales have sufficient internal consistency and convergent and discriminate validity (van Zuuren, 1988). • Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) (Beck, Erbaugh, Ward, Mock, & Mendelsohn, 1961; Beck, Steer, Ball, & Ranieri, 1996). The BDI is a self-report questionnaire and consists of 21 items (rated 0 to 3), each describing a depressive symptom in four levels of severity. Total scores range from 0 to 63. The BDI-II has high internal consistency with a Cronbach*s alpha of .91 (Beck et al., 1996; van der Does, 2002). • World Health Organization Quality of Life - Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) (Trompenaars, Masthoff, Van-Heck, Hodiamont, & De-Vries, 2005). The WHOQOL-Bref was developed as an international cross-culturally comparable self-report quality of life assessment instrument. It assesses the individual's perceptions of quality of life in the context of their culture and value systems, personal goals, standards and concerns across 4 domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The internal consistency of the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref ranged from 0.66 to 0.80. Domain scores of the WHOQOL-Bref correlated around 0.92 with the WHOQOL-100 domain scores. Relatively low correlations were found between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and WHOQOL-Bref domain scores. It is concluded that the content validity, construct validity, and the reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of adult Dutch psychiatric outpatients are good (Trompenaars et al., 2005). Mechanisms of change: • Difficulties in Emotion Regul

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)