Skip to content

The Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Prostate Cancer Assessed by Procedural Related Side Effects and Post Prostatectomy Histology: A Prospective Human In-Vivo Study

The Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Prostate Cancer Assessed by Procedural Related Side Effects and Post Prostatectomy Histology: A Prospective Human In-Vivo Study - IRE-Prostate

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39362
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-12-18
Start date
2013-08-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate cancer Prostatic neoplasm

Interventions

Ablation with IRE will be performed using similar planning criteria, procedure protocol, instruments and software used for brachytherapy, a conventional targeted radiation therapy where radioactive

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Life expectancy > 10 years 2. Histologically confirmed organ-confined prostate cancer (clinical stage T1-T2) 3. Gleason score *7 4. PSA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Other Conditions/Status: a) Bleeding disorder as determined by prothrombin time (PT) > 14.5 seconds, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) > 34 seconds, and Platelet Count

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a) To determine if the IRE ablation procedure is safe as measured by the composite number of procedural, device and post procedural adverse events measured with the CTCAE proforma. b) To determine if complete ablation of the specified targeted ablation zone is achieved as measured by histopathology assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a) To determine if procedural side effects associated with current treatments for prostate cancer, mainly incontinence, erectile dysfunction and bowel damage are avoided as measured by the validated prostate cancer scores *EPIC, IIEF-5 and IPSS or time of CAD required. b) To determine patient satisfaction and comfort measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, post procedural pain management and pain scores, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay. c) To determine accurateness of ablation zone detection by MRI/CEUS.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)