Skip to content

More Options available with a quadripolar LV lead provide in clinic solutions to CRT challenges

More Options available with a quadripolar LV lead provide in clinic solutions to CRT challenges - MORE-CRT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39245
Enrollment
75
Registered
2011-10-19
Start date
2011-11-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart failure with dyssynchrony

Interventions

Implantation of a CRT-D device with a quadripolar LV Lead (treatment group) or with a traditional biventricular LV lead (control group).

Sponsors

St. Jude Medical
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients are indicated for CRT*D implantation, as per current international certified guidelines - Patients age is 18 years or greater - Patients must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing the appropriate informed consent form - Patients must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Patients with a life expectancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survival from the composite endpoint of intra*operative and post*operative endpoints. Intra*operative LV lead related endpoint: * Due to phrenic nerve stimulation, lead instability or high capture threshold: o Changing to a different tributary vein of the coronary sinus following site evaluation o Using more than one LV lead during the procedure for any reason. o Using any device (eg. a stent) to actively fixate the lead * Unsuccessful implant for any reason Post*operative: Any serious adverse device effect (SADE) related to the LV lead Abandoned CRT for any reason

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
* % of CRT responders (defined as patients with a reduction in LVESV of at least 10% between baseline and the 6*month follow*up visit) * % of patients with % of Biventricular Pacing >90% at 6 months post implant * Implant procedure duration (skin to skin) * Implant fluoroscopy time * Repositioning the lead within the same vein (following unsatisfactory lead site evaluation) * Final LV lead position * Reprogramming of the LV output to

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)