Skip to content

Listening Effort with Bimodal Hearing versus Cochlear Implant alone

Listening Effort with Bimodal Hearing versus Cochlear Implant alone - Listening Effort with a CI

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON39238
Enrollment
190
Registered
2011-02-03
Start date
2011-03-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deafness hard of hearing

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All: Native Dutch speakers For CI users: minimum 6 month experience in using CI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dyslexia Knowledge of Japanese or Chinese script

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study endpoint: Listening effort in terms of: - Reaction times for secondary task - Subjective task load (measured using the NASA TLX Questionaire) As a function of parameters: - Number of channels (simulated CI) - Simulated Bimodal stimulation versus CI alone - Number of channels (real CI) - Real Bimodal CI + HA vs CI alone

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary parameters are: - performance on the primary task in single- and dual-task situation - performance on the secondary task in single- and dual-task situation - response-times on the secondary tasks in single-task condition and specifically for phase 3 - speech understanding on the simple response-time task (Accuracy) - response times on the simple response-time task

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)