Skip to content

The safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe emphysema with the RePneu LVRC system: a pilot study.

The safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe emphysema with the RePneu LVRC system: a pilot study. - RECOIL study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON38678
Enrollment
12
Registered
2013-12-12
Start date
2014-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD emphysema

Interventions

Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Treated with the RePneu LVRC system > 24 months ago. 2) Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID) of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter) or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml) or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points). 3) Subject has marked dyspnea scoring >=2 on mMRC scale of 0-4. 4) Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study. 5) Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form. 6) Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing. 7) Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject*s ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea. 2) Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by: PaCO2 >8.0 kPa; PaO2 50 mm Hg via echocardiogram. 5) Subject has an inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes. 6) Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study. 7) Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe. 8) Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia. 9) Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis. 10) Subject has giant bullae >1/3 lung volume. 11) Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy. 12) Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study. 13) Subject is taking >20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily. 14) Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder. 15) Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure. 16) Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel. 17) Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy. 18) Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Lung function - Change in RV, 6 months following treatment - Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment - Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment Quality of life - Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment - Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment Functional measures - Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment - Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)