Skip to content

Comparison of Adequacy of Anesthesia Monitoring with Standard Clinical Practice during Routine General Anesthesia

Comparison of Adequacy of Anesthesia Monitoring with Standard Clinical Practice during Routine General Anesthesia - 123.04-2012-GES-0009

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON38660
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-08-19
Start date
2014-01-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

specifieke aandoeningen zijn niet van belang voor het onderzoek N.A.

Interventions

extra non-invasive monitoring of Entropie and SPI to measure adequacy of analgesia

Sponsors

GE Healthcare Attn: Petra Peltola, Clinical Research Manager
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age 18-80 years of age • Surgery that is expected to last at least 2 hours under general anesthesia with endotracheal tube

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Any subject with a cardiac pacemaker • Any subject with atrial fibrillation at the time of obtaining the baseline values • Any subject with more than 5 ventricular extra systoles/minute at the time of obtaining the baseline values • Any subject who needs invasive blood pressure measurement • Any subject who show hemodynamics that would have qualified for being considered as a sign of inadequate anesthesia already at baseline • Any subject with epidural anesthesia or analgesia during the surgery. Epidural catheter may be placed pre-operatively, and used in the PACU, but not during the surgery • Any subject having surgery that requires prone position • Any subject with very high body mass index (>35) because of incompatibility with the target controlled anesthesia models used • Any subject with known allergies to the specific anesthetic agents/ analgesic drugs intended for use in their surgeries • Any subject with laryngeal mask airway • Any subject who is going to have major surgery with a high risk of extensive blood loss • Any subject with known chronic use of opioids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Incidence of hemodynamic instability including hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia and bradycardia • Incidence of subject movements including somatic arousal, somatic response

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Amount of anesthetic and analgesic drugs used • Time points of the operation (start of monitoring, induction, loss of consciousness, intubation, start of surgery, maximum surgical stimuli, end of surgery, discontinuation of anesthetics, open eyes on verbal command (emergence from anesthesia), extubation) • In the recovery room, the modified Aldrete-Score, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain using a 0-10 numerical pain intensity rating (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) scale are recorded. • On the first postoperative day, all subjects are asked by a blinded investigator if they had any memory or awareness during anesthesia and the level of satisfaction with the whole surgical procedure using a 0-100 scale. • SPI and Entropy values from the test group

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)