Digital workflow to produce CAD/CAM fixed prosthesis (Lava Plus) on dental implants (Straumann) with the use of CBCT based (flapless) Guided surgery (coDiagnostix) and Intra-oral Scanning (True Definition Scanner - 3M)

Digital workflow to produce CAD/CAM fixed prosthesis (Lava Plus) on dental implants (Straumann) with the use of CBCT based (flapless) Guided surgery (coDiagnostix) and Intra-oral Scanning (True Definition Scanner - 3M) - 3D in implantology - *from planning to scanning*.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON38606

Enrollment

Registered

2013-12-04

Start date

2013-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ontbrekende gebitselementen Missing teeth / diasthema

Interventions

In this study titanium implants are inserted in the jaw bone. This is done with a widely used and well documented implant type. This is thus not considered an experimental intervention. De supra-str

a widely used and well docuemented restorative material in dentistry. This application focuses primarily on applying an extra (non invasive) measurement tool: the intra-oral scanner. De images gat

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients requiring dental implants for the support of fixed crowns and/or bridges in the resorbed posterior area. - Good general Health (ASA Score 1&2) - If additional bone augmentation is required this will preferably be done before the patient is included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients under the age of 18. - Women pregnant at intake (because of CBCT taken during diagnostic phase). - Implant placement wanted on incisor locations. - Implant sites certainly requiring bone augmentation during implant placement

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The clinical fit of CAD/CAM supra-structures based on conventional- or digital impressions will be judged by the restorative dentist who places the crown or bridge. For that reason, the dentist fills in a questionnaire on the fit not knowing to which group the supra-structure belonged. - Three outcomes are possible: perfect fit, acceptable fit and non-acceptable fit.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. The accuracy of computer guided surgery. Measured by superimposing the implant positions from the planning software with the positions gathered by the intra-oral scan made 3 months after implant insertion. - Outcomes: deviation at implant apex (in mm), deviation at implant entry point (in mm), and angular deviation (in °). 2. Analyzing the dimensional changes in the treated area during the entire treatment period. With digital subtraction of all intra-oral scans of one patient the differences can be quantified in mm3. 3. Describing implant survival, surgical- and prosthetic complications up to one year after restoring the implants. The clinical use of CAD/CAM restorations on dental implants is thus quantified.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. The accuracy of computer guided surgery. Measured by superimposing the implant positions from the planning software with the positions gathered by the intra-oral scan made 3 months after implant insertion. - Outcomes: deviation at implant apex (in mm), deviation at implant entry point (in mm), and angular deviation (in °). 2. Analyzing the dimensional changes in the treated area during the entire treatment period. With digital subtraction of all intra-oral scans of one patient the differences can be quantified in mm3. 3. Describing implant survival, surgical- and prosthetic complications up to one year after restoring the implants. The clinical use of CAD/CAM restorations on dental implants is thus quantified.

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)