Skip to content

Randomised controlled study of dose reduction and withdrawal strategies of adalimumab and etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis: saving costs at what expense?

Randomised controlled study of dose reduction and withdrawal strategies of adalimumab and etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis: saving costs at what expense? - DRESS study: Dose REduction Strategies of Subcutaneous TNF inhibitors

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON38325
Enrollment
180
Registered
2011-11-17
Start date
2011-12-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic arthritis rheumatoid arthritis

Interventions

In the intervention group usual care and tight control is provided and the treating rheumatologist is advised to try to increase interval of adalimumab or etanercept. If a patient uses adalimumab th

Sponsors

Sint Maartenskliniek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Rheumatoid arthritis (either 2010 ACR RA and/or 1987 RA criteria and/or clinical diagnosis of the treating rheumatologist, fulfilled at any time point between start of the disease and inclusion) - Using either adalimumab or etanercept (all dose/interval regimens, all background medication including DMARDs and corticosteroids up to 5 mg, higher doses of steroids should be reduced first) - 6 months of stable low disease activity while using adalimumab or etanercept (operationalised by either a DAS28

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Co morbidity that also requires treatment with anti-TNF and thus prevents dose reduction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
- Cumulative incidence of patients fulfilling prespecified loss of response/flare criteria in the intervention and the usual care group after 9 months and after 18 months of follow up. - Cost effectiveness (cost minimisation) ratio between intervention group and usual care group for the 9 month induction phase and for the 12 months maintenance phase. - Predictive values/characteristics of a prediction model including (change in) serum drug levels and PET arthritis. - Proportion of patients with a change in modified Sharp-van der Heijde Score> MCIC in the intervention and usual care group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Mean DAS28 in intervention and usual care group at 9 and 18 months follow up. - Mean time averaged DAS28 in intervention and usual care group at 9 and 18 months follow up. - Proportion of patients with a DAS28

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)