Skip to content

Selecting Outcome measures for MITOchondrial disease in children (the SO-MITO study)

Selecting Outcome measures for MITOchondrial disease in children (the SO-MITO study) - Selecting outcome measures for mitochondrial disease in children

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON38137
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-04-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitochondrial disease

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
2 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * 2-17 years old at the inclusion date and * Biochemical group (see paragraph 4.2.2 of the protocol) o mitochondrial dysfunction in muscle biopsy AND a mitochondrial phenotype and/or o a confirmed pathogenic mutation, in case of mtDNA mutation in sufficient heteroplasmy to explain phenotype, agreement on pathogenicity between two physicians working in different centres * Syndromal group (see paragraph 4.2.1 of the protocol) o Fulfilling the criteria of the specific syndrome o A confirmed pathogenic mutation or biochemical defect (only in Leigh)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Insufficient knowledge of the native language spoken in the hospital the child is seen in * It is expected that the studies will be too burdensome for the patient or the family * End-of-life expected within 3 months from the initiation of the study * Other disabling disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Per test, per patient group: * The percentage of patients who were able to complete the test * The inter-rater reliability of one assessor * The intra-rater reliability of two assessors * The test-retest reliability after two weeks * The correlation between parameters pre-specified per disorder (see paragraph 7.1) * The correlation between these parameters over time (including a VAS-score for the patient*s and parents* experience on disease severity and disease progression)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Per patient group: * The SD and clinically significant difference (minimal important change; * 2 points difference on the 11-item VAS scale of disease severity of both patient and parents and/ or * 2 point difference on the 11 item VAS-scale of disease progression of both patient and parents in the same direction as the effect of the study parameter) of the two most reliable instruments * The time to complete the inclusion of all patients (calculated from the day the study starts recruiting). * A description of the clinical symptoms, with focus on the functional abilities and challenges * The correlation between the concentration of several biomarkers and functional abilities and general disease severity

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)