The clinical and radiological outcome of patients with recurrent radiculopathy after hernia surgery and lytic spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous sextant pedicle fixation

The clinical and radiological outcome of patients with recurrent radiculopathy after hernia surgery and lytic spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous sextant pedicle fixation - Outcome of lumbar interbody fusion with Sextant technique

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON37902

Enrollment

Registered

2012-03-16

Start date

2011-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

radiculopathy spinal nerve entrapment

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults (>18 yrs) Patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level lumbar spine fusion with new sextant technique (performed in St Elisabeth hospital between 2002 and 2010)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No spondylodesis prior to the spinal fusion with sextant technique Age

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Does significant subsidence of the cage occur two years after surgery in these 80 patients? If there is significant subsidence, is there a significant difference between the groups?	—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Is the outcome of patients undergoing 1- or 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion in combination with minimally invasive pedicle screw placement (MIP-PLIF technique) the same for patients who had residual hernia surgery pain as for patients with lytic spondylolisthesis?	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results