FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Optos fundus photography versus fundoscopy for detecting retinal defects and retinal detachments.

Comparison of Optos fundus photography versus fundoscopy for detecting retinal defects and retinal detachments. - Comparison of Optos fundus photography versus fundoscopy.

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON37870
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-08-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

retinal defect retinal detachment

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged 18 or above complaining of light flashes and floaters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age below 18 years. Absence of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of retinal defects/detachments detected on Optos fundus photographs. The gold standard is a confirmed defect or detachment detected with fundoscopy performed by an ophthalmologist.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
none—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)