Skip to content

Randomized comparison between a DES and a BMS to assess neointimal coverage by OCT evaluation

Randomized comparison between a DES and a BMS to assess neointimal coverage by OCT evaluation - DEMONSTRATE study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON37395
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-04-02
Start date
2012-05-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

coronary artery desease stenosis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

CID S.p.A.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patient is eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is an acceptable candidate for surgical revascularization (CABG) - Target de-novo lesion - Target lesion located in a target vessel with a diameter ranging from 2.5 to 3.75 mm - Patient has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site - patients presenting with at least two vessels disease requiring a staged procedure within 3 months, according to the operator judgement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - patient presenting with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation - Known allergies to antiplatelets, anticoagulants, contrast medica, sirolimus or cobalt chromium - thrombocytopenia (platet count less than 100,000/mm3) - Co-morbidities that could interfere with completion of study procedures, or life expectancy less than 1 year - participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ratio of Uncovered to Total Stent Struts Per Cross Section (RUTTS) score of 0 µm.]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Percentage of malapposed stent struts at immediate post intervention and at pre-specified OCT follow-ups. [Malapposition is defined as distance >= 80µm from the inner edge of the strut to the vessel wall]; - Percentage of malapposed and uncovered stent struts at pre-specified OCT follow-ups;

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)