Skip to content

The analgesic efficacy of Δ9-THC (Namisol®) in patients with persistent postsurgical abdominal pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel design

The analgesic efficacy of Δ9-THC (Namisol®) in patients with persistent postsurgical abdominal pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel design - Δ9-THC in persistent postsurgical pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON37384
Enrollment
68
Registered
2012-03-21
Start date
2012-10-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal postsurgical pain

Interventions

Namisol® with standardized &Delta
9-THC content or identical matching placebos will be administered orally to evaluate the analgesic properties of Namisol® during a 52 days add-on treatment to other analgesics. The study consists of
day 6-10: 5 mg TID), and a stable dose phase (day 11-52: 8 mg TID). The dosage may be tapered to at least 5 mg TID, when 8 mg is not tolerated.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Aged 18 years or older •Postsurgical pain •Standard analgesic treatment (paracetamiol/ NSAIDs) failed •Pain duration exceeding 3 months, and average NRS>=3 •Stable doses intake of analgesics for the past 2 months •The patient has been informed about the study, understood the information and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •Regular cannabis use in past 3 years. •Patient is diagnosed with irritated bowel syndrome (IBS), chronic pancreatitis or post cholecystectomy pain syndrome. •Patient has an indication for a pain treatment other then medication •Patient took cannabinoids on a regular basisin past 3 years •Patient does not feel a pinprick test in the lower extremities •Patient has a body mass index (BMI) above 33,0 kg/m2 •Patient has a significant medical disorder that may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient •Patient uses any kind of concomitant medication that may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient •Patient does not tolerate oral intake of medication or liquids, or is refrained from oral intake because of medical reasons •Patient demonstrates clinical relevant deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) •Patient has an actual moderate to severe renal impairment •Patient has an actual moderate to severe hepatic impairment •Patient has a presence or history of major psychiatric illness •Patient has experienced an epileptic seizure in the past •Patient demonstrates clinically significant laboratory abnormalities •Patient demonstrates a positive urine drug screen for THC, cocaine, MDMA, and amphetamines •Patient an active hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV infection •Patient has a history of sensitivity / idiosyncrasy to THC •Patient has a known or suspected lactose intolerance •Female patient is pregnant or breastfeeding •Patient intends to conceive a child during the course of the study •Patient participates in another investigational drug study •Patient has a clinical significant exacerbation in illness •Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the lifestyle guidelines

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Pain intensity (diary) o VAS average pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Pain intensity (diary) o VAS minimal pain o VAS maximal pain • EEG o ERPs to noxious electrical stimuli o ERPs to auditory stimuli (oddball) o FFT spontaneous EEG • QST (visceral screenings protocol) o Pressure pain thresholds o Electric pain thresholds o Electric wind-up response o DNIC • Questionnaires o Izbicki o PGIC o PCS o VASBond & Lader o VASBowdle o SF-36 o HADS o PASS • Pharmacodynamics o Body Sway • Functional o Body weight o Supplementary feeding • Safety o Laboratory o ECG o HF / BP o Adverse events • Pharmacokinetics o THC, 11-OH-THC and THC-COOH concentrations

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)