Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Embozene Microspheres for Uterine Fibroid Embolization compared to Embosphere for Symptomatic Relief from Uterine Fibroids

Safety and Efficacy of Embozene Microspheres for Uterine Fibroid Embolization compared to Embosphere for Symptomatic Relief from Uterine Fibroids - UFE FDA Celonova

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON36953
Enrollment
35
Registered
2012-12-18
Start date
2012-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine Fibroids

Interventions

All study participants will have the embolization procedure and the assignment of the patients to this particular therapeutic strategy falls within current practice of medicine. The two treatment gr

Sponsors

Celonova
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Pre-menopausal women age 30-50 years at time of enrollment. -Heavy menstrual bleeding with or without pain and bulk related symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant patient or intends to become. Has HIV or other immunodeficient state Already infarcted or calcified fibroids present. Présence or suspicion of malignancy or infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary effectiveness endpoint for this clinical trial is the proportion of subjects who have success, defined as 50% menstrual blood loss (MBL) reduction or less than 80 ml of MBL per cycle, evaluated by the alkaline hematin (AH) method, at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is the frequency of treatment emergent adverse events. There will be no hypothesis test for this endpoint because the rates of treatment emergent adverse events for embolization are very small, ranging from 0.04 - 0.2% in the literature.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are three secondary effectiveness endpoints for this study: 1) The proportion of subjects with at least 90% infarct of the uterine fibroid at 6 months following treatment; 2) The impact of excessive bleeding of fibroids on quality of life will be assessed with the UFS QOL Questionnaire; And 3) The need for re-intervention with repeat embolization or other therapy for treatment failure assessed. The results over time of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom & Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire will be compared descriptively. The mean response to pivotal summary evaluations will be presented for each treatment group, and within treatment groups the results will be compared to baseline.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)