Skip to content

Assessment of the hand grip in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis, and healthy individuals while using the E-cone.

Assessment of the hand grip in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis, and healthy individuals while using the E-cone. - Reliability and validity of the E-cone for the assesment of hand grip.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON36780
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-03-29
Start date
2012-02-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

rheumatic diseases rheumatoid arthritis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Reade, centrum voor revalidatie en reumatologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Group 1 patients: Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis. Patients have been referred for treatment in the hand rehabilitation team in Reade, location Jan van Breemen. During examination patients have an abnormal pattern of grasping due to contractures, subluxation, tight intrinsic muscles or joint deviation. ;Group 2: healthy individuals: No problems with the hand, at present or in the past. Normal grasping pattern and during physical examination, no impairments of the hands.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Group 1: Status after amputation of 1 or more (parts of) fingers of the hand that will be assessed. Patients who have used the E-cone during treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The reliability and validity of the E-cone during assessment of the hand grip in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis, and healthy individuals.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Other questions: 1. What is the reliability (intra - and interreliability) of the clinical assessment of the grasp pattern of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis and healthy individuals while using the E-cone? 2. What is the reliability (intra - and interreliability) of the assessment of the pressure distribution measured by the E-cone of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or hand arthrosis and healthy individuals? 3. What is the association between the clinical assessment of the grasp pattern and the measured pressure distribution by the E-cone? 4. What is the association between the clinical assessment of the grasp pattern on the one hand and the function of the hand (assessed by means of the HAQ - grip) and the activity level (assessed by the DASH) on the other hand? 5. What is the association between the pressure distribution during grasping on the one hand and the function of the hand (assessed by means of the HAQ - grip) and the activity level (assessed by the DASH) on the other hand? 6. What is the association between the clinical assessment of the grasp pattern and the digitalized output of the E-cone? 7. What is the association between the pressure distribution during grasping and the digitalized output of the E-cone? 8. What is the association between the digitalized output of the E-cone pressure (hand function) on the one hand and the function of the hand (assessed by means of the HAQ - grip) and the activity level (assessed by the DASH) on the other hand?

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)