Modification of cognitive interpretation bias by training in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder

Modification of cognitive interpretation bias by training in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder - Modification of cognitive interpretation bias in youth with OCD

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON36692

Enrollment

Registered

2011-10-25

Start date

2011-09-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

OCD

Interventions

The Cognitive Bias Modification procedure (CBM-I, Matthews & Mackintosh, 2000) will be used. the training consists of 50 short stories (scenarios). For the patients in the positive training conditio

Eligibility

Age

12 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: diagnosis obsessive compulsieve disorder, obsessions age between 12 and 18 years informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: psychosis serious depression

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
OBQ-CV: The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-Child Version (OBQ-CV) is a 44-item youth version of the widely used adult OBQ-44.[24] The adult OBQ-44 was designed to comprehensively assess OCD-related beliefs.[25,26] Refinement of the measure has produced a 44-item scale assessing OCD-related beliefs across three domains: responsibility/threat, perfectionism/certainty, and importance/ control of thoughts.[24] The scales of the adult OBQ-44 have been found to have strong internal consistency in clinical samples (full scale a 5.95, subscales range from .89 to .95), as well as strong convergent validity with measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Coles, Wolters, Sochting, De Haan, Pietrefesa & Whiteside, (ingediend voor publicatie).OBQ-CV: The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-Child Version (OBQ-CV) is a 44-item youth version of the widely used adult OBQ-44.[24] The adult OBQ-44 was designed to comprehensively assess OCD-related beliefs.[25,26] Refinement of the measure has produced a 44-item scale assessing OCD-related beliefs across three domains: responsibility/threat, perfectionism/certainty, and importance/ control of thoughts.[24] The scales of the adult OBQ-44 have been found to have strong internal consistency in clinical samples (full scale a 5.95, subscales range from .89 to .95), as well as strong convergent validity with measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Coles, Wolters, Sochting, De Haan, Pietrefesa & Whiteside, 2011). LOI-CV: Leyton Obsessional Invertory - Child Version: The LOI-CV is a 20-item self-report measure of current obsessive compulsive symptoms present over the past 2 weeks. It has high internal reliability (a = .81), specificity (77%- 84%), and sensitivity (75%-88%) (Berg et al., 1988; Flament et al., 1988). The original scoring method requires yes/no answers plus a rating of the degree of interference for each positively scored item. For this study, scoring used was a 4-point measure of symptom frequency (always	—

Measure

Time frame

OBQ-CV: The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-Child Version (OBQ-CV) is a 44-item youth version of the widely used adult OBQ-44.[24] The adult OBQ-44 was designed to comprehensively assess OCD-related beliefs.[25,26] Refinement of the measure has produced a 44-item scale assessing OCD-related beliefs across three domains: responsibility/threat, perfectionism/certainty, and importance/ control of thoughts.[24] The scales of the adult OBQ-44 have been found to have strong internal consistency in clinical samples (full scale a 5.95, subscales range from .89 to .95), as well as strong convergent validity with measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Coles, Wolters, Sochting, De Haan, Pietrefesa & Whiteside, (ingediend voor publicatie).OBQ-CV: The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-Child Version (OBQ-CV) is a 44-item youth version of the widely used adult OBQ-44.[24] The adult OBQ-44 was designed to comprehensively assess OCD-related beliefs.[25,26] Refinement of the measure has produced a 44-item scale assessing OCD-related beliefs across three domains: responsibility/threat, perfectionism/certainty, and importance/ control of thoughts.[24] The scales of the adult OBQ-44 have been found to have strong internal consistency in clinical samples (full scale a 5.95, subscales range from .89 to .95), as well as strong convergent validity with measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Coles, Wolters, Sochting, De Haan, Pietrefesa & Whiteside, 2011). LOI-CV: Leyton Obsessional Invertory - Child Version: The LOI-CV is a 20-item self-report measure of current obsessive compulsive symptoms present over the past 2 weeks. It has high internal reliability (a = .81), specificity (77%- 84%), and sensitivity (75%-88%) (Berg et al., 1988; Flament et al., 1988). The original scoring method requires yes/no answers plus a rating of the degree of interference for each positively scored item. For this study, scoring used was a 4-point measure of symptom frequency (always

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
RCADS: Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scales. The initial version of the RCADS began with a 56-item adaptation of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1997, 1998). In addition to the 38 SCAS anxiety items, seven new items re¯ecting excessive worry were added to the RCADS item pool to provide an improved test of the structural validity of the GA scale. These items were generated from existing questionnaires related to GAD criteria and pathological worry in children (Chorpita, Tracey, Brown, Collica & Barlow, 1997; Reynolds & Richmond, 1978). Further, new items were added to assess depression, generated from evaluation of the DSM-IV criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as well as existing measures of childhood depression (e.g. Kovacs, 1980/1981). The initial depression item pool was 25 items, corresponding to the nine symptoms of Criterion A for DSM- IV Major Depressive Episode (these also subsumed the six symptoms of Criterion B for DSM- IV Dysthymic Disorder). This pool was evaluated by a panel of seven experts in the area of childhood anxiety and mood disorders, and was then narrowed to 11 items that were felt best to sample the content domain for the purposes of empirical investigation. Children rate how often each item applies to them. Items are scored 0 to 3 corresponding to ``never'', ``sometimes'', ``often'' and ``always''. (Chorpita, Yim, Mo, Umemoto & Francis, 1999). CDI: Children Depression Inventory. The Children*s Depression Inventory (CDI) is a widely used, 27-item self-report of depressive symptoms for children and adolescents (Kovacs, 1985). Raw scores range from 0 to 54; a score of 16 is often cited as the threshold for depression (Smucker et al., 1986). However, the specificity of the CDI for the diagnosis of depression has been questioned, and some investigators have suggested that it measures emotional distress more generally (Costello and Angold, 1988). (Scahill e.a., 1997).	—

Measure

Time frame

RCADS: Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scales. The initial version of the RCADS began with a 56-item adaptation of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1997, 1998). In addition to the 38 SCAS anxiety items, seven new items re¯ecting excessive worry were added to the RCADS item pool to provide an improved test of the structural validity of the GA scale. These items were generated from existing questionnaires related to GAD criteria and pathological worry in children (Chorpita, Tracey, Brown, Collica & Barlow, 1997; Reynolds & Richmond, 1978). Further, new items were added to assess depression, generated from evaluation of the DSM-IV criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as well as existing measures of childhood depression (e.g. Kovacs, 1980/1981). The initial depression item pool was 25 items, corresponding to the nine symptoms of Criterion A for DSM- IV Major Depressive Episode (these also subsumed the six symptoms of Criterion B for DSM- IV Dysthymic Disorder). This pool was evaluated by a panel of seven experts in the area of childhood anxiety and mood disorders, and was then narrowed to 11 items that were felt best to sample the content domain for the purposes of empirical investigation. Children rate how often each item applies to them. Items are scored 0 to 3 corresponding to ``never'', ``sometimes'', ``often'' and ``always''. (Chorpita, Yim, Mo, Umemoto & Francis, 1999). CDI: Children Depression Inventory. The Children*s Depression Inventory (CDI) is a widely used, 27-item self-report of depressive symptoms for children and adolescents (Kovacs, 1985). Raw scores range from 0 to 54; a score of 16 is often cited as the threshold for depression (Smucker et al., 1986). However, the specificity of the CDI for the diagnosis of depression has been questioned, and some investigators have suggested that it measures emotional distress more generally (Costello and Angold, 1988). (Scahill e.a., 1997).

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)