Skip to content

Alternative APAP Method for Non-invasive Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in OSAHS patients. Amendment: Mallampati score as a predictor for effective Positive Airway Pressure

Alternative APAP Method for Non-invasive Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in OSAHS patients. Amendment: Mallampati score as a predictor for effective Positive Airway Pressure - RAPAP-study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON36517
Enrollment
33
Registered
2010-06-03
Start date
2010-07-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnoea Syndrome

Interventions

Participating subjects will receive randomly two modes of PAP-therapy. One PAP mode will be given constant pressure (CPAP) and the other mode will deliver restricted APAP treatment (RAPAP). Both tre

Sponsors

Medisch Spectrum Twente
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects of 18 years or older PAP-therapy naive patients with confirmed OSAHS Moderate OSAHS - AHI 15 - 30 events/hours and a least mild sleepiness Severe OSAHS - AHI > 30 events/hours and at leat mild sleepiness Moderate to severe sleepiness with AHI > 5 events/hours Able to understand, read and write Dutch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Central sleep apnea syndrome Cheyne-Stokes respiration Signs of severe nasal obstruction Major facial or pharyngeal anatomic abnormalities likely to require surgery. Previous surgical treatment of UPPP Night or rotating shift work Severe chronic heart failure class IV Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease defined by the GOLD-criteria stage 3 to 4 (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity [FVC]

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is patient*s adherence for treatment modes. It is measured by recording the amount of sleeping time per night in hours with the PAP device. Amendement: Regression formula predicting the optimal pressure setting for sleep apnea patients for the population that was investigated and may be extrapolated to sleep apnea patients overall.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are: subjective: sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Score), quality of life (disease specific: Quebec Sleep Questionnaire, and generic: SF-36), preference for treatment mode and tolerance, and objective: polygraphy with both PAP treatment modes and by downloading data (AHI) of the PAP device.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)