Fractuurgenezing bone growth stimulation Fracture healing
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: -Adult women or men, age >= 55 to
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Conditions that may affect the ability to perform functional or clinical assessments required by the protocol, such as: • Severe symptomatic osteoarthritis of the lower extremity • Inability to independently rise from armchair or walk 200 meters before hip fracture (use of unilateral assistive device or rolling walker is acceptable) • Cognitive deficit, as defined by Mini-Mental Status Examination score 16 -Pathological fracture or history of metabolic or bone disease that may interfere with the interpretation of the results, such as Paget*s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing*s disease, hyperprolactinemia -History of symptomatic spinal stenosis that has not been surgically corrected. If surgically corrected, the subject must be asymtomatic to be eligible for the study -History of facial nerve paralysis -Malignancy (except fully resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years -Severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or recent exacerbation -Myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within the last 12 months -Current alcohol dependence- -History of solid organ or bone marrow transplants -hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia, outside of 1.1 x the normal range set by the local laboratory -Use of the following agents affecting bone metabolism •Within the past 12 months: parathyroid hormone, strontium, fluoride (for osteoporosis) •Within the past 6 months: IV bisphosphonates, denosumab, odanacatib (MK-0822) •WIthin the past 3 months: calcitonin, tibolone, cinacalcet, systemic glucocorticosteroids (>=5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 10 days) -BMP-2 or BMP-7 at the time of definitive fracture fixation -Subjects to be enrolled in DXA sub-study may not have had previous instrumentation with implants (ie, nails, screws, pins, plates) to either hip or lower spine -Subject has known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered (calcium supplements, vitamin D products, or mammalian cell derived products)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To investigate the effect of AMG 785 compared to placebo on functional healing as measured by the timed-up-and-go test (TUG) over Weeks 6 through 20 in subjects with fresh unilateral low energetic hip (intertrochanteric or femoral neck) fracture (refer to Appendix F for description of TUG procedure). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To investigate the effect of AMG 785 compared to placebo on: • TUG by visit • Time to radiographic healing • Harris Hip Score • Pain as a result of the hip fracture as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | — |
Countries
Netherlands