Creation of buttonhole cannulation tracks: conventional vs supercath

Creation of buttonhole cannulation tracks: conventional vs supercath - Buttonhole cannulation tracks: conventional vs supercath

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON35942

Enrollment

Registered

2011-07-05

Start date

2011-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hemodialysis -dialysis

Interventions

creation buttonhole track by either the conventional or the supercath method.

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -patient receiving hemodialysis -recently created AV fistula or existing AV fistula with cannulation problems

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -PTFE loop -shunt depth> 0,8 cm -physical inability to create pressure on AV fistula during shunt bleeding -living alone

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Compare the effect of buttonhole track creation by either the conventional or the supercath method on - succesfull creation buttonhole after development phase ( supercath 10 days- traditional 12 days) - succesfull usage buttonhole track during 6 months (scoring number miscannulations)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Compare the effect of buttonhole track creation by either the conventional or the supercath method on - skin/shunt infections - pain perception patient (VAS scores) - costeffectiveness/ logistics - required angiografpic inrteventions.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)