Active stimulation of positive affect and mobilisation of psychological resources during burn out treatment

Active stimulation of positive affect and mobilisation of psychological resources during burn out treatment - PsyMate intervention in burn out

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON35867

Enrollment

Registered

2011-10-12

Start date

2012-09-03

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occupational stress stress-related disorder

Interventions

The Psymate intervention contains feedback about activities that lead to an increase of the different aspects of Work Engagement, namely vigor, dedication and absorption. The first and second sess

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (i) 18-65 years, (ii) meeting the criteria of burn out using the UBOS questionnaire (iii) adequate vision, and (iv) sufficient Dutch language skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia), schizoaffective disorder (current) or a bipolar disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Aim 1: Main outcome measures are pre - post intervention change in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire. Aim 2: Pre and post intervention changes in PA, NA and person-tailored strategies as measured with the PsyMate are the main outcome measures for this aim. Aim 3: Follow up measures are changes in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire. Aim 4: This economic evaluation will involve a combination of a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA). In a CEA effects are presented in clinical outcomes (in our study increase of work engagement, decrease of burn out and relapse). The primary outcomes measure for the cost-utility analysis will be Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), based on the EuroQol utility scores, which is measured with the TiC-P, PRODISQ and EQ-5D. The health care consumption and costs are compared between the two groups on base-line and at 12 and 24 weeks follow up. Aim 5: Changes in daily life experiences and their relation with future burn out are measured with the Psymate. Aim 6: not applicable	—

Measure

Time frame

Aim 1: Main outcome measures are pre - post intervention change in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire. Aim 2: Pre and post intervention changes in PA, NA and person-tailored strategies as measured with the PsyMate are the main outcome measures for this aim. Aim 3: Follow up measures are changes in burn out symptomatology as measured with the UBOS questionnaire and Work Engagement as measured with the UWES questionnaire. Aim 4: This economic evaluation will involve a combination of a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA). In a CEA effects are presented in clinical outcomes (in our study increase of work engagement, decrease of burn out and relapse). The primary outcomes measure for the cost-utility analysis will be Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), based on the EuroQol utility scores, which is measured with the TiC-P, PRODISQ and EQ-5D. The health care consumption and costs are compared between the two groups on base-line and at 12 and 24 weeks follow up. Aim 5: Changes in daily life experiences and their relation with future burn out are measured with the Psymate. Aim 6: not applicable

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)