Midterm results open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a follow-up study

Midterm results open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a follow-up study - open vs closed tibial osteotomy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON35361

Enrollment

Registered

2012-03-15

Start date

2011-04-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

standcorrection valgus osteotomy

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who had a CWO or OWO and participated in the study CMO 2002/181

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Our primary objective is to compare the midterm clinical and radiographic results (6 to 8 years) of CWO versus OWO with a locked plate fixation in the management of patients with medial knee OA and a varus leg alignment with a prospective follow-up study (of a previous RCT conducted by Gaasbeek et al.: CMO number 2002/181).The primary result is the survival rate at 5 year with as endpoints conversion to TKA or UKA and re-operation.	—

Measure

Time frame

Our primary objective is to compare the midterm clinical and radiographic results (6 to 8 years) of CWO versus OWO with a locked plate fixation in the management of patients with medial knee OA and a varus leg alignment with a prospective follow-up study (of a previous RCT conducted by Gaasbeek et al.: CMO number 2002/181).The primary result is the survival rate at 5 year with as endpoints conversion to TKA or UKA and re-operation.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Visual Analogue Scale pain, VAS satisfaction, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS) and complications Radiographic evaluation: Radiographs of varus leg alignment (loss of correction), of OA of the knee on AP and lateral views radiographs, Caton*s index (CI) and tibial slope on true lateral radiograph views in 30gr of flexion.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results