Skip to content

A prospective randomised clinical trial Comparing *Rotterdam* splint VS Stack splint in the treatment of tendinous mallet injury, with or without additional hand rehabilitation

A prospective randomised clinical trial Comparing *Rotterdam* splint VS Stack splint in the treatment of tendinous mallet injury, with or without additional hand rehabilitation - Rotterdam spalk VS Stack spalk

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON35246
Enrollment
160
Registered
2009-03-18
Start date
2009-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pees letsel Extensor tendon injury

Interventions

Patients are treated with standard therapy (= Stack splint), standard therapy with additional hand therapy, perceived/ presumed improved splint (= R splint) with additional hand therapy, or perceive

Sponsors

Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Tendinous malletfinger

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fractures, mallet thumb and age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
At the end of therapy and at 3 months post-therapy, range of motion and extension lag is measured by the same examiner (EA) with a goniometer and compared with the contralateral digit. The skin and nails are examined for deformities and laceration. Stiffness and pain of the digit is noted. Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) forms are used to asses participants* satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nvt

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)