Skip to content

fMRI in analytical vs non-analytical clinical reasoning

fMRI in analytical vs non-analytical clinical reasoning - fMRI clinical reasoning

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON35101
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-12-15
Start date
2011-04-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

geen n.a.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Expert neurologists (more than 10 years clinical experience) 2. Between 40-60 y.o.a. 3. normal sight, hearing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. MR incompatible implants in the body 2. Neurological complaints in the past as well as present 3. Use of medication which may influence task performance 4. Claustrophobia 5. The wish not to be informed in case of discovered brain anomalies 6. (Suspected) pregnancy 7. Tattoos

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
(1) Does non-analytical clinical reasoning result in different activation patterns than analytical clinical reasoning? (2) If so, is it possible to relate these activation differences in higher order reasoning processes to X- and C-systems, as described by others in simpler decision processes?

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
n.a.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)