Skip to content

Lateral C1-2 Joint Pulsed Radiofrequency Application in the treatment of Cervicogenic Headache

Lateral C1-2 Joint Pulsed Radiofrequency Application in the treatment of Cervicogenic Headache - Lateral C1-2 Joint PRF: A RCT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON34846
Enrollment
70
Registered
2010-06-23
Start date
2010-01-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical headache Headache from the neck

Interventions

In this RCT, the effectiveness of lateral C1/2 joint pulsed radiofrequency application (LPRF) is compared to conventional C3-5 facet denervation (MBRF). The 2 procedures differs in several aspects.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male and female patients who are 18 years or more of age. Patients with a history of chronic, function-limiting cervicogenic headache of at least 3 months duration. Patients who are able to provide voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this evaluation. Patients willing to return for follow-ups. Patients without a history of recent surgical procedures (i.e. within the last 6 months)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with uncontrolled major depression or psychiatric disorders. Patients with recent history of heavy opioid usage, chronic alcoholism or substance abuse. Patients with acute or uncontrolled medical illness, malignancy or poorly controlled epilepsy. Patients with chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments. Patients with fibromylagia or painful syndromes of unknown origin or associated with diffuse pains. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, Patients with histories of adverse reactions to local anesthetic or steroids Patients with anatomical abnormalities on cervical spine X-ray that may result in technical difficulties for blocks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary study parameter is the proportion of patients that experience more than 50% pain relief at 1 month after either procedure. Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for pain will be recored at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Secondary objectives include the rescue rates (proportion of patients with less than 50% pain relief requiring additional treatment).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes in this study includes 1. The proportion of patients that require additional treatment 1 month after the first procedure 2. The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) scores at 1, 2 and 3 moth intervals using the PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) . 3. Scores from 4 questionnaires a. SF-36 (Quality of Life) b. HIT-6 (Headache Impact) c. NDI (Neck Disability Index) d. MOS Sleep Scale (Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)