Skip to content

Prospective randomised controlled study on tumescent local anesthesia for Mohs Micrographic Surgery ( MMS) compared to conventional anesteshia with lidocaine/ epinephrine 1 %

Prospective randomised controlled study on tumescent local anesthesia for Mohs Micrographic Surgery ( MMS) compared to conventional anesteshia with lidocaine/ epinephrine 1 % - Tumescent local anesteshia for Mohs Micrographic surgery.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON34466
Enrollment
18
Registered
2010-06-17
Start date
2010-10-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painsensation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Catharina-ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a basal cell carcinoma on the scalp, the nose, or the forehead, wich will be treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergy for lidocaine/epinephrine 1% or substances in the tumescent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Registration of the pain perception during anesthesia. Registration of the pain during the operation . Registration of the pain postoperative .

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The duration of the anesthetic effects. The vasoconstrictive effects of the TLA.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)