Skip to content

Randomized and controlled study of the effects of low intensity monochromatic 'blue light' compared to the standard light treatment of seasonal complaints (winter depression and winterblues)

Randomized and controlled study of the effects of low intensity monochromatic 'blue light' compared to the standard light treatment of seasonal complaints (winter depression and winterblues) - monochromatic blue light vs standard light treatment in seasonal complaints

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON34402
Enrollment
100
Registered
2010-11-18
Start date
2010-11-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

seasonal affective disorder (winter type) winterblues

Interventions

Experimental treatment is exposure to low intensity blue monochromatic light, compared to standard light treatment

Sponsors

Philips Consumer Lifestyle/ S. Hermans
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - age between 18-65 yr - no other treatments for seasonal complaints during the same time - no traveling to southern counties during study period - no use of tanning fixtures during study period - informed consent;1. seasonal affective disorder (SAD), winter type, according to DSM-IV score of at least 18 on the first 24 items of the SIGH-SAD 2. sub-syndromal seasonal affective disorder (sub-SAD, winterblues) acording to the Kasper et al. (1988) criteria: - SPAQ-GSS score of 8,9 or 10 and at least light seasonal complaints or - SPAQ-GSS score of 11 score of 12-17 on the first 24 items of the SIGH-SAD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: other Axis -I disorders according to DSM-IV acute suicidal risk use of pschopharmaca or photosensitsizing drugs eye diseases or complaints exept aging diabetes epilepsy night shifts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sores on the SIGH-SAD interviews

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
none

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)