Gallbladder removal Symptomatic Gallstones
Conditions
Interventions
The conventional technique
Patients undergo surgery under general anesthesia and positioned in the supine
position. The operator is left of the patient. The other set-up is as usual in
a laparosco
Sponsors
Alysis Zorggroep
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patient on waitinglist for laparoscopic gallbladder removal Age between 18 and 70 years BMI
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: In Prior history; Cholecystitis, ERCP, Upper GI surgery, other liver disease, Cancer in upper GI trackt, Alcohol or substance abuse Participation in other research Psychiatric condition Unability to comply to study criteria Patients without social network/ unable to care for themselves Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main objective research Investigate whether a significant difference in pain (VAS score) between the conventional laparoscopic approach and the approach for a gallbladder removal LESS Either VAS scores | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary goals a. Explore the possibility of a significant difference in abdominal and umbilical rupture between the different approaches b. Investigate whether a significant difference in wound infection between the different approaches. c. Investigate whether a difference in patient satisfaction as to the final outcome between the different approaches. d. Investigate whether there is a difference in overall complications between the different approaches e. Investigate whether there is a difference in operative time f. Investigate whether there is a difference in treatment costs Either outcome echoes observations infection outcome, VAS score | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed