Skip to content

Erythrocytapheresis versus Phlebotomy as maintenance therapy in patients with hereditairy hemochromatosis; a randomised, single blinded, sequential, cross-over trial

Erythrocytapheresis versus Phlebotomy as maintenance therapy in patients with hereditairy hemochromatosis; a randomised, single blinded, sequential, cross-over trial - Erythrocytapheresis versus Phlebotomy in HH patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33962
Enrollment
48
Registered
2008-02-21
Start date
2008-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ironacumulation Ironoverload

Interventions

TE as a new therapeutic modality to reduce and/or prevent iron overload during maintenance therapy. This method will be compared with P, which is the current standard maintenance therapy. TE allows

Sponsors

Sanquin Bloedbank
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ironoverload, homozygous for C282Y, treated with Phlebotomy as maintenance therapy for at least 6 month Demonstrated therapy compliance with prescribed P so far Ferritin level between 30-50 ug/L at start of the inclusion Age 18 years an older Weight > 50 kg Signed informed consent Willigness to fill out additional questionnaires at three points in time

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients recieving others therapies such as chelating therapy or forced dietary regimen Patients younger than 18 years Patients with excessive overweight ( BMI>35) Patients which are mentally incapacitade Women being pregnant or expecting/planning to become pregnant during the two years period of the study Patients with a malignancy HH patients which are current blood donors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint: The difference in number of required treatments and the interval between treatments per year to keep the serum ferritine levels between 30 - 50 µg/L.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The potential preference of the patients for one of the techniques. To obtain the answer to this secondary question, the patients are asked to fill in validated questionares (SF 36, EQSD, NRS BASDAI)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)