Primary treatment of vaginal prolapse, pessary use versus prolapse surgery. A comparison of quality of life.

Primary treatment of vaginal prolapse, pessary use versus prolapse surgery. A comparison of quality of life. - Pessary versus prolaps surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON33706

Enrollment

Registered

2009-09-14

Start date

2009-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prolapse

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Vaginal prolapse stage 2-4 (POP-Q criteria, ICS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Prolapse surgery of incontinence surgery in the history

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary outcome will be disease specific quality of life, as measured with the urogenital distress inventory (UDI).	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcomes will be women*s perceived improvement in the prolapse symptoms, clinicians grading of prolapse at one year of follow-up.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results