Skip to content

Comparison of thromboelastometry with classical coagulation tests in cardiac surgery

Comparison of thromboelastometry with classical coagulation tests in cardiac surgery - ROTEM study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33435
Enrollment
23
Registered
2009-07-16
Start date
2009-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coagulation hemostasis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery Age 18-90 years Preoperative hemoglobin of > 5.5 mmol/l Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Re-operations and emergency operations Use of erythropoietin Patients receiving blood transfusions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of comparison of ROTEM INTEM clotting time and aPTT (classical coagulation test)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Level of comparison of FIBTEM and Clauss test for fibrinogen. Demographic variables: Age, gender, length, body weight, preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocyte count. Surgical characteristics: Surgery time, clamp time, CPB time. Medicine use: use of drugs that influence coagulation Administration of blood products and fluid, urine production Comparison of treatment decision based on classical coagulation parameters and ROTEM analysis.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)