Skip to content

The inter-examiner difference in diagnosis in acute abdominal pain and the role of decisional tools

The inter-examiner difference in diagnosis in acute abdominal pain and the role of decisional tools - Diagnostic accuracy in acute abominal pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33310
Enrollment
300
Registered
2009-11-23
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

aandoeningen geassocieerd met acute buikpijn Acute abdominal pain quickly developed bellyache

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Abdominal pain with a duration of more then 2 hours and less then 5 days - Willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the accuracy of diagnosis of surgeons, surgical residents and ED physicians as well as the accuracy of diagnosis before and after the use of decisional tools for suspected appendicitis and diverticulitis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Certainty of diagnosis before and after using decisional tools, accuracy of diagnosis after using the standard imaging pathway, imaging resource utilisation, length of stay in the Emergency department levels WBC, CRP and Procalcitonin

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)