FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Signature* Personalized Patient Care versus the intramedullary alignment guides by computer-navigated registration of bone cuts in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of Signature* Personalized Patient Care versus the intramedullary alignment guides by computer-navigated registration of bone cuts in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Signature* Personalized Patient Care

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33295
Enrollment
14
Registered
2009-09-14
Start date
2009-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

gonarthrosis knee wear

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Orbis Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: painfull and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved high need to obtain pain relief and improve function above 18 years old body mass index (BMI)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: active infection in the knee general infection distal foci of infections which may spread to the implant site faillure of previous joint replacement pregnancy previous osteotomy Prostesis (hip, knee or ankle), intramedullary fixation or any kind of metal in the lower extremities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cutting plane angles—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
resection level—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)