Skip to content

MR Elastography versus FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease

MR Elastography versus FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease - MR elastography

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33250
Enrollment
95
Registered
2009-11-02
Start date
2009-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

liver fibrosis scarring of liver parenchyma

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients over 18 years of age; Patients suspected of chronic viral or chronic non-alcoholic liver disease with an indication for liver biopsy (ASAT elevated >60 mmol/l (n

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients under 18 years of age; Alcohol consumption of >3 units/day for males and >2 units/day for females; Patients who are pregnant; Patients who are claustrophobic (MRI scanner); Patients who have magnetic or radiofrequency sensitive implants (MRI scanner); Patients with extreme obesity (MRI scanner)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of MR Elastography in diagnosing liver fibrosis compared with FibroScan and histopathology in patients suspected of chronic viral liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
*The feasibility of combining MR Elastography and proton MR Spectroscopy in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to distinguish between simple steatosis and NASH. *The evaluation of antiviral treatment response with combined MR Elastography and MR Spectroscopy versus FibroScan in patients with chronic viral liver disease. *The influence of increased hepatic fat content and inflammatory activity on viscoelasticity measurements. *The burden of liver biopsy, MR Elastography and FibroScan.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)