Skip to content

A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with oseltamivir in preventing influenza transmission in nursing home units

A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with oseltamivir in preventing influenza transmission in nursing home units - RCT oseltamivir PEP nursing homes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33181
Enrollment
4000
Registered
2009-09-01
Start date
2010-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

flu influenza like illness (ILI)

Interventions

Post-exposition prophylaxis with oseltamivir or placebo. Once laboratory confirmation has been obtained in an index case, all residents and staff of that implicated unit only will be randomly assigne

Sponsors

RIVM
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The unit of randomisation will be nursing home units in nursing homes willing to participate, and where virologically confirmed influenza is diagnosed in an index case. In these units, all residents (apart from the index case(s)) and staff are eligible for randomisation to PEP with oseltamivir or PEP with placebo.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No consent, medical contra-indication to oseltamivir.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Transmission, the primary trial outcome measurement, is defined as a newly laboratory confirmed influenza in the same unit 12 hours or more after the start of PEP. Assuming 30 homes participate, that annually 30% of nursinghomes experience a confirmed influenza outbreak in on average two units, than we can recruit 20 units per season. Assuming that without effective prophylaxis ongoing transmission occurs in 40% of the units, we will have at least 80% power after 3 seasons with a two-sided alpha=0.05 to demonstrate a reduction in transmission of 70%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
This trial offers an excellent opportunity to evaluate the possible emergence of resistance against oseltamivir if used under such circumstances, by analysing the occurrence of viral mutations under oseltamivir therapy (for index- and for any secondary cases). In addition, we will assess the relative cost-effectiveness of PEP with oseltamivir per nursing home unit, compared to not using PEP by prospectively collecting information on the number of influenza infections and related complications, duration of symptoms, use of medical services by secondary cases, as well as sickness leave of staff. Finally, potential ethical and logistical restrictions for the large scale use of oseltamivir will be documented prospectively

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)