Skip to content

Measuring the influence of cutaneous feedback on human motor control

Measuring the influence of cutaneous feedback on human motor control - The influence of cutaneous feedback on human motor control

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON33099
Enrollment
10
Registered
2009-10-21
Start date
2010-01-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystonia sustained abnormal limb posture

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy volunteer, who is capable of following instructions to the letter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medical history of neurologic disorders with extremity involvement. Hypersensitivity to anestetics: marcaine, lidocaine, bupivavacaine, prilocaine or mepivacaine. Known to have low blood pressure or a history of cardiac or vascular diseases or diabetes mellitus. Orthopedic or other diseases of the right foot/ankle Prior surgery of the right foot/ankle.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healthy humans can easily adapt their posture control strategies to perform a wide range of tasks. The feedback response to changing forces and positions can be characterized by the measured admittance: the causal dynamic relationship between force (input) and position (output), essentially describing the mass-spring-damper characteristics of a limb. It is in fact the inverse of impedance or to put it in a more clinical way: stiffness. For different tasks a different admittance is optimal. In the experiment the adaptability of the admittance is determined using three task instructions: 1. Force task: *give way to force perturbations* 2. Relax task: *relax; do not react to the force perturbations* 3. Position task: *resist force perturbations*. As the primary outcome variable the admittance at the lowest frequency will be used for each task; this is the closest approximation to the true stiffness (the impedance at the zero frequency).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)