Skip to content

The effect of biofeedback training on trunk sway in frail older persons with impaired balance.

The effect of biofeedback training on trunk sway in frail older persons with impaired balance. - Balance biofeedback training in frail older persons with balance impairment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON32946
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-01-11
Start date
2010-02-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Verminderde balans Balance impairment

Interventions

The balance feedback systeem (Balance Freedom). The feedback system exists of a headband, which is connected to a device on the back of the subject. This device provides information about the trunk

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged 60 or over Ability to walk > 15 m (use of a walking aid allowed) Tinetti score

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cognitive disturbances (MMSE

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The effect of repeated performance of the balance assessments on trunk sway (pitch and roll angle and pitch and roll velocity) in frail older persons with balance impairment (A2 vs A0). In addittion, we will determine the experiences of frail older persons with the biofeedback balancetraining.

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The direct effect (A3 vs A2) and the effect after one week (A4 vs A2) of a short biofeedback balancetraining on trunk sway (pitch and roll angle and pitch and roll velocity) in frail older persons with balance impairment during several balance tasks (during walking and stance). The main outcome measures will be differences in duration of the task, the 90% range of pitch and roll sway angle, and the 90% range of pitch and roll sway angular velocity. To derive 90% values a histogram of pitch or roll samples of each subject*s trial was developed by dividing the peak-to-peak range into 40 bins; when subsequently excluding the extreme 5% of values in the histrogram the 90% range was derived.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)