Skip to content

The use of foley catheter results in less interventions as compared to the use of propess

The use of foley catheter results in less interventions as compared to the use of propess - FLIC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON32840
Enrollment
194
Registered
2009-01-08
Start date
2009-03-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ripening/priming

Interventions

At the moment there is a indication for induction they get the information letter. With help of the randomisation procedure they will get into the group of propess of into the group of the Foley ca

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: single pregnancy at term who has a bishop score lower than 6

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: broken membranes/who have had a sectio/bad foetal condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
percentage of caesarean sectio

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- bishop 6 or higher after treatment - neonatale outcome - fever - the amount of syntocinon - total gifts of propess - time to delivery - total costs - anesthesia

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)