traumatisch hersenletsel
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1) deficient score on the Neuro Behavioural Affect Profile (NBAP, Nelson, 1998) 2) deficient score on the Facial Expression of Emotion TEst (FEEST, Young, 2003) AND/OR orbitofrontal/mediofrontal damage on MRI
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders, lack of self-awareness (indicated by a difference score of 0 on the self-rating version of the NBAP between rating of premorbid and present functioning), severe cognitive comorbidity interfering with the ability to follow treatment (global aphasia, neglect, amnestic syndrome).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Improvement of social cognition, that is, a significant difference between pre- and postmeasurement on the The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT, Mc Donald, 2003). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Checklists and questionnaires for social functioning in daily life (KATZ adjustmentscales,(KAS-R, Goran & Fabiano, 1993), Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX, Wilson, e.a., 1996), NBAP, Nelson, 1998,, Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI, Von Steinbuchel e.a., 2005). Tests for social cognition (FEEST ( Young e.a., 2002), Cartoon Test (Happe e.a. 1999), Faux Pas test (Stone e.a., 1998), Sustained Attention to response Task (SART, Robertson e.a., 1997), Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara e.a., 1994), Emotional Empathy Questionnaire (EEQ, Mehrabian & Epstein,1972), Read the Mind in the Eyes (Baron-Cohen, e.a., 1997) ), for executive functioning (Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS, Wilson et al, 1996)), and an estimation of premorbid IQ by means of the Dutch version of the NART (NLV, Schmand e.a., 1992). | — |
Countries
Netherlands