OIL - BASED CONTRAST VERSUS WATER BASED CONTRAST MEDIA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TUBAL PATENCY AT HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY

OIL - BASED CONTRAST VERSUS WATER BASED CONTRAST MEDIA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TUBAL PATENCY AT HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY - water versus oil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON32658

Enrollment

1080

Registered

2009-02-23

Start date

2011-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tubal obstruction uterus picture

Interventions

Hysterosalpingography eighter with oil- or waterbased contrast media.

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Age between 18 and 39 years * Subfertility of at least one year * Chlamydia Antibody Titre (CAT) negative (MIF

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Endocrino-pathological disease as: Polycystic ovary syndrome, Cushing syndrome, adrenal hyperplasia, hyperprolactinemia, acromegaly, hypothalamic amenorrhea, hypothyroidy, diabetes mellitus type I. * Known or high risk for tubal pathology, CAT positive (MIF titre > 1:64 or ELISA > 1.1) * Known contrast (iodine) allergy * Male subfertility defined as a post-wash total motile sperm count

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
ongoing pregnancy rates	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
live birth rate, miscarriages, ectopic pregnancy, pain score, coital frequency before and after HSG, pregnancy leading to live birth.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)