Skip to content

TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR LARGE RECTAL ADENOMAS

TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR LARGE RECTAL ADENOMAS - TREND study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON32240
Enrollment
186
Registered
2008-08-07
Start date
2009-02-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

rectal adenoma rectal polyp

Interventions

TEM: under general anesthesia a TEM tube is inserted in the rectum. With specialized instruments the adenoma will be dissected en bloc by a full thickness excision, after which the patient will be a

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Diagnosed with a large non-pedunculated rectal adenoma with a largest diameter of at least 3cm. (2) The lower and upper borders of the adenoma are located at >1cm and

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Suspicion for invasive cancer during endoscopy or endoscopic ultrasonography (2) Proven invasive cancer with biopsies (histology)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) proportion of patients with adenoma recurrence after 3 months; 2) number of days not spent in hospital from initial treatment until 2 years afterwards; adenoma recurrence after 3 months is defined as treatment failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
3) morbidity, subdivided into major (requiring surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention); 4) disease specific and general quality of life; 5) anorectal function; 6) health care utilization and costs.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)