The clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

The clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - NA

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON32085

Enrollment

140

Registered

2008-01-30

Start date

2009-01-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

joint wear osteoarthritis

Interventions

Blinding is done by utilising a straight paramedian medial incision through which both UKA and TKA can be adequatly performed. The initial incision length is 25 cm for TKA and 10 cm for UKA. The 10

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Patients must have an healthy intact lateral knee compartment, which is determined on X-rays (stage 0 Kellgren and Lawrence- and Ahlback-classification on standard standing AP, lateral and valgusstress knee X-ray).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, SLE, arthritis psoriatica) 2. Recent septic arthritis 3. Flexion contracture > 10 degrees 4. Preoperative range of motion (ROM) 15 degrees 6. Deficient anterior cruciate ligament 7. Previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
WOMAC-score	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.KSS and SF-36-score 2.Complications, revisions 3.Postoperative flexion of the operated knee 4.Radiographical analysis 5.Hospital- and recoveryperiod 6.Bloodloss (Hb pre- en postoperative, peroperative bloodloss, transfusions)	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)