Skip to content

Cost-effectiveness of nerve root decompression according to Gill versus instrumented fusion in the treatment of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis; a multicenter prospective randomised trial.

Cost-effectiveness of nerve root decompression according to Gill versus instrumented fusion in the treatment of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis; a multicenter prospective randomised trial. - The Sciatica-Gill trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON31621
Enrollment
220
Registered
2008-04-25
Start date
2008-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

spondylolisthesis vertebra slipp off

Interventions

Nerve root decompression according to Gill versus instrumented spondylodesis.

Sponsors

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-70 years. Low grade spondylolytic spondylolisthesis (grade I or II). Sciatica or neurogenic claudication with/without backpain. Symptoms lasting more than 3 months. Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: High grade spondylolytic spondylolisthesis (grade III or IV). Backpain only. Progressive spondylolisthesis. Abnormal mobility on dynamic X-ray (> 3 mm). Previous lumbar surgery at level of spondylolisthesis. Severe comorbidity / contraindication surgery. Planned (e)migration in the year after surgery. Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is an illness-specific 23 item functional assessment questionnaire; the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secundary outcome measures are: horizontal 100mm Visual Analoge Scale (VAS) for legpain and backpain, perceived recovery on the 7-point Likert scale adjusted to job and hobby, functional outcome of the patient by the surgeon using the Macnab classification, work experience according to the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire, emotional status of the patient determined by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), quality of life according to a generic health status questionnaire SF-36, Quality-Adjusted-Lifeyears (QALY) based on EuroQol, serum level creatine phosphokinase (CPK) , dynamic X-ray of the lumbar spine, complications and re-operation incidence. The economic evaluation will compare differences in societal costs to differences in the primary outcome measure (NDI) and in quality adjusted life years (QALYs). In the primary analysis QALYs will be calculated from the EQ-5D, in secondary analyses also from the SF-6D and VAS. Sensitivity analyses will be performed on the intervention costs, societal versus health care perspective, and the applied utility measure (EQ-5D, SF-6D or VAS). A time-horizon of 5 years will be used, with discounting for both costs and QALYs.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)