Skip to content

Evaluation of SHARM project RIAGG Maastricht

Evaluation of SHARM project RIAGG Maastricht - Evaluation SHARM

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON31342
Enrollment
250
Registered
2007-04-20
Start date
2007-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Het onderzoek is diagnose onafhankelijk: kort durende behandeling bij psychische problematiek indication for short term treatment mental health problem

Interventions

The intervention is the short term treatment as offered by professionals of the RIAGG in the GP's practice. However, it is not a new intervention. The short term treatment in the GP's practice by a

Sponsors

Universiteit Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: age over 18 patients who are expected to be helped with short term treatment by professional of RIAGG in GP practice

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: younger as 18 for other reasons as short term treatment at professional of RIAGG in GP practice

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Several parameters are chosen to determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-tility of the short term care at the GP's practice. These will be measured by means of questionnaires. Effectiveness - Health status - Quality of life Efficiency - Health care costs costs of sessions, transportation costs professionals, consumption in other sectors. - Patient family costs Transportation, costs informal care, out-of-pocket expenses - Productivity losses

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Next to results on cost-effectiveness and cost-utility, also process implications will be studied with the next parameters. Continuity / coordination - Referral behavior by GP - Number of referrals - Amount of no-shows - Presence feedback Access - amount of days between GP and first contact - amount of days between different professionals Appropriateness - Presence of evidence based guidelines - Use of evidence based guidelines - Use of criteria for referral Organizational structure - Work setting - Workload Staff - Compilation of staff

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)