Laparoscopic versus open abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. A comparison of effectivity, quality of life and costs.

Laparoscopic versus open abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. A comparison of effectivity, quality of life and costs. - Laparoscopic versus open sacral colpopexy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON30804

Enrollment

Registered

2007-04-02

Start date

2007-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

vault prolapse

Interventions

INTERVENTIONS: Open abdominal sacral colpopexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All hysterectomised patients with a vaginal vault prolapse are elegible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a contraindication for a surgical intervention will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome will be quality of life. The urogenital distress inventory (UDI) will be the quality of life measure in this trial.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcome will be women*s perceived improvement in the prolapse symptoms and clinicians post-operative grading of prolapse until one year of follow-up, costs and cost-effectiveness.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)