Skip to content

The Impact of Psychological and Medical Factors of Women having a Child with a Congenital Anatomical Malformation on Subsequent Pregnancy Decision-Making: a psychological evaluation.

The Impact of Psychological and Medical Factors of Women having a Child with a Congenital Anatomical Malformation on Subsequent Pregnancy Decision-Making: a psychological evaluation. - Impact of factors on Susbsequent Pregnancy Decision-Making - 1.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON30607
Enrollment
100
Registered
2007-04-26
Start date
2008-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

factors influencing reproductive decision-making posttraumatic stress

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Dutch mothers of children with Congential Diaphragmatica Hernia or with Esophageal Atresia, both with or without associated anomalies will be asked to participate. Their children are 2 or 5 years old at the time of inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Mothers of children diagnosed with other congenital (anatomical) anomalies than a Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia or Esophageal Atresia, 2. Mothers of children of ages other than 2 or 5 years, 3. Mothers from other ethnic origins than the Dutch.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Factors that influence reproductive decision-making for a subsequent pregnancy: 1. repetitive risk; 2. strength of wish for offspring; 3. prenatal testing and genetic counseling; 4. severity of the congenital anatomical malformation(s); 5. time elapsed since the birth of the afflicted child (2 or 5 years after); 6. symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder; 7. the specific cognitive coping style (monitoring versus blunting);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Anxiety, depression, somatic complaints; 2. Quality of life; 3. Adaptation.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)