Skip to content

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial - Retention versus sacrifice of the PCL in total knee arthroplasty.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON30597
Enrollment
120
Registered
2007-08-22
Start date
2008-01-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoarthrosis of the knee joint

Interventions

60 patients receiving the posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty, 60 patients receiving the posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty

Sponsors

Martini Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: primary symptomatic osteoarthrosis of the knee non fixed varus and valgus deformity of less than 10 degrees age between 55 and 85 years BMI less than 35 kg/m2 ASA I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: secondary osteoarthrosis of the knee (active) arthritis (eg rheumatic disease) flexion less than 90 degrees flexion contracture over 10 degrees peripheral neuropathy history of CVA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patients perceived outcome after TKA as determined with the WOMAC questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motion Knee Society Clinical Rating System as physician-based outcome score after TKA. Quality of Life as determined with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Gait parameters Femoral roll back

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)