Dysfunctional voiding, long-term follow-up of a biofeedback training program.

Dysfunctional voiding, long-term follow-up of a biofeedback training program. - long-term study, DV

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON30452

Enrollment

Registered

2007-06-05

Start date

2007-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysfunctional voiding urinary incontinence caused by improper pelvic floor behaviour

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients that have been trained between 1987 and 1990

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: none

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The same parameters will be used as in 1994. 1. number of wet incidents a week 2. micturition frequency 3. urge complaints 4. flow pattern in a subgroup. Results will be classified as good, improved or bad. - 1 wet incident or less per week, combined with 3 normalised parameters is considered good. -less then 3 wet incidents per week, a normal flow pattern combined with improvement of 1 of the 2 remaining parameters is considered improvement. - 2 or more wet incidents per week with 2 of the 3 remaining parameters unchanged is considered bad. The result is also bad when complaints are unchanged. ICCS terminology will be followed as much as possible.	—

Measure

Time frame

The same parameters will be used as in 1994. 1. number of wet incidents a week 2. micturition frequency 3. urge complaints 4. flow pattern in a subgroup. Results will be classified as good, improved or bad. - 1 wet incident or less per week, combined with 3 normalised parameters is considered good. -less then 3 wet incidents per week, a normal flow pattern combined with improvement of 1 of the 2 remaining parameters is considered improvement. - 2 or more wet incidents per week with 2 of the 3 remaining parameters unchanged is considered bad. The result is also bad when complaints are unchanged. ICCS terminology will be followed as much as possible.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comorbidity consisting of recurrent UTI's and constipation. Determination of risk-factors for recurrence of complaints.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results