Skip to content

Optimized convective volumes in postdilution HDF using ULTRACONTROL - Effect on blood purification efficacy

Optimized convective volumes in postdilution HDF using ULTRACONTROL - Effect on blood purification efficacy - ULTRACONTROL HDF study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON30377
Enrollment
10
Registered
2007-02-27
Start date
2006-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic kidney disease hemodialysis

Interventions

The intervention in this study consists out of the randomisation of the three dialysis modalities (A) post-dilution HDF with ULTRACONTROL
(B) post-dilution HDF with volume control and (C) standard high-flux hemodialysis. This randomisation will only be carried out for the second treatment of week 2 to week 4. For all other treatments

Sponsors

Gambro Lundia AB
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 on dialysis since 3 months or longer 2 stable on on-line postdilution HDF therapy since at least 1 month 2a of which at least one week in ULTRACONTROL mode using Polyflux H dialyzer 2b known on what total UF rate in relation to QB is possible during volume control mode when Polyflux H dialyzer is used, without having monitor TMP alarms 3 regularly achieving a blood flow rate of 250 ml/min or more 4 giving written consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Age 5 hours 4 Showing unstable blood flow rates and/or regularly showing access recirculation exceeding 5%. 5 Treatments in single needle mode 6 Expected to show poor compliance to dialysis prescription 7 Known HIV, HBV, or HCV infection 8 Known coagulation disorder 9 Pregnant women, nursing mothers and women planning a pregnancy during the course of the study 10 Patients under guardianship 11 Participation in other studies that could interfere with the objectives of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint of the randomized, cross-over comparison between treatment modes is the pre- to post-dialysis reduction in plasma b2-microglobulin level

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2. As secondary endpoints, the following indices of treatment efficacy will be used a. blood urea reduction from pre- to post-dialysis b. Diascan Kt/V using Watson V as input c. phosphate reduction from blood levels pre- and post-dialysis d. uric acid reduction from blood levels pre- and post-dialysis e. CRP reduction from blood levels pre- and post-dialysis f. removal of complement factor D, based on changes in plasma level from pre- to post-dialysis g. removal of cystatin C, based on changes in plasma level from pre- to post-dialysis h. b2m, cystatin C, and factor D mass in spent dialysate i. albumin mass in spent dialysate

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)