Protein hydrolysate versus intact protein intake as means to promote muscle protein anabolism: fiber-type specific effects of exercise?

Protein hydrolysate versus intact protein intake as means to promote muscle protein anabolism: fiber-type specific effects of exercise? - Protein hydrolysate versus intact protein and exercise

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON30340

Enrollment

Registered

2006-11-06

Start date

2007-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

preverntie sarcopenie loss of muscle mass sarcopenia

Interventions

Study A: intake of protein hydrolysate versus intact protein Study B: resistance exercise versus rest Study C: resistance exercise

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: BMI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI > 30, diabetes, other disease states, regular physical exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
All interventions will affect muscle protein synthesis. With the application of amino acid tracer methodology we are able to determine muscle (fiber-type specific) protein synthesis.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Study A: differences in rate of uptake/absorption for the intestine using the application of intrinsically milkproteins.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)