Skip to content

Prognostic factors for cartilage degeneration in the knee after meniscectomy and cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective observational MRI cohort study

Prognostic factors for cartilage degeneration in the knee after meniscectomy and cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective observational MRI cohort study - Prognostic factors for knee OA development.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON29928
Enrollment
700
Registered
2006-08-24
Start date
2006-08-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage degeneration degenerative disease

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Reumafonds
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participation in the study "MRI triage for arthroscopy" 1997.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnacy. Contraindications for MRI: pacemaker, implants etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Objective 1) To identify high risk patient groups for development of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a cohort 9-10 years after meniscus, cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. •Primary parameters: Kellgren-Lawrence Grading System for radiological OA of the knee. The Altman score for radiological OA of the knee. Objective 2) To determine the use of 3T MRI state of the art imaging in detecting early OA in the knee. •Kellgren-Lawrence Grading System for radiological OA and the Altman score for radiological OA of the knee compared to KOSS (Knee Osteoarthritis Score System) grading for OA in MRI. Objective 3) To determine if functionality of the knee is affected by arthroscopic intervention. •Primary parameters: Noyes and Tegner questionnaires for functionality of the knee. KOSS (Knee Osteoarthritis Score System) grading for OA in MRI. Objective 4) To determine if genetic predisposition (hand OA, family history) is associated with development of OA of the knee. •Primary parameters: DNA tests compared to the Kellgren-Lawrence Grading System for radiological OA and the Altman score for radiological OA of the knee

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Objective 1) To identify high risk patient groups for development of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a cohort 9-10 years after meniscus, cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. •Secondary parameters: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), SF-36 generic health assessment questionnaire. Biomarkers in serum and urine: CTX-II, Glc-Gal-PYD, and PIIINP Objective 2) To determine the use of 3T MRI state of the art imaging in detecting early OA in the knee. •Secondary parameters: KOSS (Knee Osteoarthritis Score System) grading for OA in MRI compared to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).Objective 3) To determine if functionality of the knee is affected by arthroscopic intervention. •Secondary parameters: Physical examination of instability, range of motion, crepitus and signs of inflammation of the knee. SF-36 generic health assessment questionnaire Objective 4) To determine if genetic predisposition (hand OA, family history) is associated with development of OA of the knee. •Secondary parameters: DNA tests compared to questionnaires for family history, physical examination and X-ray of the hand.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)